Label facts

Prostacyl label facts: the panel, transcribed in full

Q: prostacyl supplement facts panel

There is one, and it is complete: 9 rows, 9 printed amounts, a serving size of 2 capsules, 30 servings a container, no proprietary blend, five binomials, six plant parts and two standardisations. It is transcribed on this page exactly as printed. The complication is documentary rather than nutritional: the seller pack records that the sales page’s What’s inside heading printed no panel, so the merchant’s own shopfront omits the best document the product has.

Q: what does the double asterisk mean on a supplement facts panel

It marks a row for which no Daily Value has been established, and the footnote beneath the panel says so. Seven of the nine rows here carry it, correctly: the botanicals and the boron have no Daily Value, because the Food and Nutrition Board has not set one. A ** is not a warning and not an admission. It is the right mark in the right place.

Q: dl alpha tocopheryl acetate vs natural vitamin e

The dl- prefix marks the synthetic all rac form, a mixture of eight stereoisomers of which the body retains four. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements states that 1 mg of alpha-tocopherol equals 1 mg of natural RRR-alpha-tocopherol or 2 mg of the synthetic form. The 25 mg printed here therefore supplies about 12.5 mg, roughly 83% of the 15 mg Daily Value rather than the 167% printed.

Q: who makes prostacyl nutrova

The label prints Distributed By: Nutrova, Tallmadge, OH 44278, USA with the email support@nutrovalabs.com. A named distributor with a place of business, printed on the label itself, is a real credit and most products in this series do not manage it. It matches neither address the retailer publishes: the office is at 215 Park Avenue South, Floor 13, New York, NY 10003, USA and returns go to 1370 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 4, New York, NY 10019, USA.

Q: prostacyl certificate of analysis

A certificate number was supplied, P-4126-26-PR, together with a lot code, P-26/PR-4126. No certificate was supplied, no laboratory is named and no analytes are listed. On a product with a panel this complete, a certificate is exactly the document that would close the loop: it reports quantities ingredient by ingredient, which is how a reader would confirm that the nine printed amounts are the nine amounts in the capsule.

Q: prostacyl label made in usa

The label’s own mark reads MADE IN THE USA, USING FOREIGN AND U.S. INGREDIENTS, which is a properly qualified country-of-origin claim and the correct way to make one. A compact badge in the marketing set reads simply Made in USA, unqualified. Where the two disagree, the label is the better document and this site prints the label.

Last updated October 12, 2026Who wrote and checked this page

This is the label page, and for once in this series it is a transcription rather than an argument about a missing document. The panel exists, it is complete, and it is printed here exactly as supplied. What follows it is the rest of the wrap — the directions, the caution block, the storage lines, the Other Ingredients line, the distributor and the three foot-of-label marks — then the one conversion that changes a printed percentage, the derivation step by step, and all eighteen findings numbered.

Prostacyl carries a complete Supplement Facts panel: 9 ingredients, 9 printed amounts, a serving size of 2 capsules, 30 servings a container and no proprietary blend. Five rows name a species, six name a plant part and two print a standardisation. The one printed figure this desk corrects is the vitamin E percentage: 167% is printed where the declared synthetic form delivers about 83%.

What 21 CFR 101.36 requires

Nutrition labelling for dietary supplements is set out in 21 CFR 101.36. It is not a rule about tone or presentation; it specifies a document. A box headed Supplement Facts, set off from the rest of the label, containing a serving size, a servings-per-container figure, and then a row for each dietary ingredient carrying that ingredient’s name and its quantity per serving.

FDA’s own labeling guide reduces the heart of it to one sentence: you must list the names and quantities of dietary ingredients present in your product. Names and quantities. On most products this desk reads, the half that is published is the half that costs the merchant nothing. Here both halves are published, nine times over.

There is a reason the rule is written that way, and it has nothing to do with paperwork. An amount is what makes a supplement checkable: it lets a reader set the product against published work, against a competitor, against the same bottle bought a year later, and against the advice of a pharmacist. This label permits all four of those comparisons. Everything else on this page is a consequence of permitting them.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter IV, Nutrition Labeling (21 CFR 101.36).

The panel, as printed

Transcribed from the label artwork supplied, character for character, read at magnification. Every amount below is printed on the label; none is derived. Tap any row to read what it delivers.

Supplement FactsServing Size: 2 Capsules · Servings Per Container: 30

Tap any row

** Daily Value (DV) not established. Other Ingredients: Gelatin (capsule), Brown Rice Flour. Distributed By: Nutrova, Tallmadge, OH 44278. Transcribed from the label artwork supplied. Every amount above is printed; none is derived.

The panel is internally consistent, which is a check worth doing

Sum the nine printed amounts and a serving comes to 808.8 mg, which is 404.4 mg a capsule at the printed two-capsule serving. A size 0 capsule holds roughly 400 to 500 mg of powder, so the fill is plausible and close to capacity, with the brown rice flour making up the remainder. The panel agrees with itself, with the serving size and with the physical object it describes. A surprising number of labels do not.

The full Prostacyl label wrap: suggested use and caution on the left, the front panel reading PRECISION PROSTATE SUPPORT BLEND in the middle, and the complete nine-row Supplement Facts panel on the right — The full label wrap as supplied: suggested use and caution on the left, the front panel in the middle, and the nine-row Supplement Facts panel on the right. One thing about the document itself — it is **pre-press artwork**, not a photograph of a printed bottle, and it still carries the production instruction for the barcode area. That is finding 12.

The footnote beneath the panel reads: ** Daily Value (DV) not established. Other Ingredients: Gelatin (capsule), Brown Rice Flour. Distributed By: Nutrova, Tallmadge, OH 44278. Transcribed from the label artwork supplied. Every amount above is printed; none is derived.

Prostacyl — 60 capsules, two a dayNine ingredients, each with a printed amount and no proprietary blend — the most transparent panel in this series. 60 or 90 days — the page prints both. From $49 a bottle on the six-pack.

Order now See the three packs

What the regulation requires, against what this label prints

Twelve lines. The left column is what a compliant label carries, the middle column says what that line means, and the right column is what this product’s label actually prints. Read the right-hand column straight down: it is the most unusual thing on this site.

Each labelling requirement, and what this label prints against it.
Required	What that means	What this label prints
The heading Supplement Facts	A panel, set off from the rest of the label with a box and a hairline rule.	Printed. The panel is on the right-hand third of the label wrap, boxed and ruled.
Serving size	The amount customarily consumed at one time, in the unit the product comes in.	2 capsules. Printed at the head of the panel.
Servings per container	How many servings the package holds.	30. Printed, and consistent with 60 capsules at 2 capsules a day.
The name of every dietary ingredient	Each ingredient named, in a fixed order, inside the panel.	All nine, named. Five carry a binomial and six carry a plant part.
The quantity of every dietary ingredient	A weight, per serving, beside each name.	All nine, printed. This is the line most products in this series fail, and this one meets it in full.
Percent Daily Value, where one is established	A percentage column for ingredients that have a Daily Value.	Printed on both vitamins. The B6 figure is correct. The vitamin E figure is roughly double what the declared form delivers.
** for ingredients with no Daily Value	A footnote marking the rows for which no Daily Value has been established.	Printed, and correct on all seven rows that need it, with the footnote beneath the panel.
A proprietary blend total, if a blend is used	The total weight of the blend, with the ingredients listed beneath it by predominance.	Not applicable — and that is the point. No blend is declared, because every ingredient carries its own figure.
Other ingredients	Everything in the product that is not a dietary ingredient, listed outside the panel.	Printed: Gelatin (capsule), Brown Rice Flour. Short, specific, and enough to establish that the capsule is not vegetarian.
Name and place of business	The manufacturer, packer or distributor, with a place of business.	Printed: Distributed By Nutrova, Tallmadge, OH 44278, USA, with an email. It matches neither address the retailer publishes.
The disclaimer, where structure/function claims are made	The statement that the claims have not been evaluated by FDA and the product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.	Printed in full, in capitals, correctly worded. Recorded here as a credit.
Directions and cautions	Not strictly part of the nutrition panel, but the two things a buyer reads next.	Both printed on the label, rather than left to the sales page. The caution block names a dose limit and four groups who should ask a physician first.

Eleven of the twelve lines are met, and the twelfth — the percent Daily Value column — is met in form and wrong in one figure. That is a different kind of page from the rest of this series, and it should be said in plain words: as a piece of label drafting this is good work. The findings on this site are about what the printed figures turn out to mean, not about whether they were printed.

The credits, recorded in the same voice as the findings

This caution block is complete and correctly drafted. It names a dose limit and the four groups who should ask first, and it is printed on the label rather than left to the sales page. That is worth saying plainly, because a great many labels this desk has read do not manage it. Two other ingredients, both named. The gelatin shell means this product is not vegetarian, which the label does not say in words but does disclose by naming the material — and which matters, because one of the badges in the marketing set reads Vegetarian.

Everything else on the wrap

The panel is one third of the label. This is the rest of it, transcribed with nothing added and nothing smoothed. Where a row records something this desk has not been shown, it says so.

Every statement printed on or supplied about the Prostacyl label.
Detail	What we were actually given
Front panel, in full	PROSTACYL · PRECISION PROSTATE SUPPORT BLEND · 60 CAPSULES · DIETARY SUPPLEMENT
Front-panel icons	Supports Healthy Prostate Size · Promotes Healthy Urinary Flow · Supports Energy & Male Vitality
Serving size	2 capsules, printed at the head of the panel
Servings per container	30, printed
Directions	As a dietary supplement, adults take two (2) capsules daily. For best results, take with 6-8 oz of water or as directed by a healthcare professional.
Caution block	Do not exceed recommended dose. Pregnant or nursing mothers, children under the age of 18, and individuals with a known medical condition should consult a physician before using this or any dietary supplement.
Storage and safety lines	KEEP OUT OF THE REACH OF CHILDREN. DO NOT USE IF SAFETY SEAL IS DAMAGED OR MISSING. STORE IN A COOL, DRY PLACE.
Other ingredients	Gelatin (capsule), Brown Rice Flour.
Distributor	Distributed By: Nutrova, Tallmadge, OH 44278, with the email [email protected]. This is a real distributor identity printed on the label itself, which is more than most products in this series manage. It does not match either address this site publishes: the retailer's office is in New York and its returns address is a different New York building. A buyer therefore deals with three names — Nutrova on the bottle, Prostacylsupport on the shop, and a generic support domain on the refund line.
Foot-of-label marks	Three marks are printed along the foot of the label: GMP CERTIFIED, MADE IN THE USA, USING FOREIGN AND U.S. INGREDIENTS, and MANUFACTURED IN A FDA REGISTERED FACILITY. The middle one is a properly qualified country-of-origin claim and is correctly drafted. The other two name no certifying body, no registration number and no audit date.
FDA statement	These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Lot code supplied	P-26/PR-4126 — a reference string in the seller pack, not a code read off a bottle.
Certificate of analysis number supplied	P-4126-26-PR — a number with no certificate behind it.
Best before	printed on the base of the bottle when the bottle shows it; no base shot was supplied, so this desk has not seen one
What the artwork also carries	A grey rectangle reading AREA FOR BARCODE with a note that the background must be white and the barcode black. That is a production instruction, which makes this a pre-press proof rather than a photograph of a retail bottle.

Three rows there are worth reading twice. The directions are on the label, not only on the sales page, which means the two-capsule serving every figure on this site rests on comes from the product itself — the right way round, and not how it usually goes. The caution block is complete. And the distributor is a real named party with a place of business, which is more than most of this series offers. The directions page works through the serving in detail.

Distributed byNutrova, Tallmadge, OH 44278

Printed on the label itself, with the email [email protected]. A real distributor identity, which most products in this series do not provide.

Country of originMade in the USA, using foreign and U.S. ingredients

Printed on the label as a properly qualified claim, in the form the FTC standard asks for. This is the correct way to make this claim.

FacilityManufactured in a FDA registered facility, GMP certified

Neither mark names a certifying body, a registration number or an audit date. Registration is a legal requirement, not an endorsement.

RetailerProstacylsupport, a U.S. stocking partner

A self-description. The sales page is a different domain, prostacyl.com, reached at a path ending /flow-warning/.

The four rows above are the provenance claims, each with where it appears and what it means. One of them is a model of its kind: the country-of-origin mark is qualified in the form the FTC standard asks for. Two of them name no certifying body, no registration number and no audit date. All ten supplied badges are set out here, including the Vegetarian badge the gelatin capsule contradicts.

The one conversion that changes a printed figure

Of the nine rows, eight print a figure that needs no correction. One does not, and it is worth taking slowly, because the correction rests entirely on a conversion NIH publishes rather than on any judgement of this desk’s.

The row reads Vitamin E (as dl-alpha tocopheryl acetate) 25 mg, 167% DV. The 167% is 25 divided by the 15 mg Daily Value. That treats the synthetic form as worth the same per milligram as the natural one, and NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements says it is not: 1 mg of alpha-tocopherol equals 1 mg of natural RRR-alpha-tocopherol or 2 mg of synthetic all rac. The serving therefore supplies about 12.5 mg of alpha-tocopherol, which is about 83% of the Daily Value.

What is printed, and what the declared form deliversNothing on this page is a ceiling. Every amount on this label is printed, so every figure here is either that printed amount or that printed amount multiplied by a printed standardisation percentage. Where this desk has had to go outside the label — to a Daily Value, an upper limit, a trial dose or a USDA food figure — the source is named in the same sentence.

Vitamin E, printed as % of the Daily Value167%

What the synthetic form deliversabout 83%

If the 25 mg is ester weightabout 76%

100% of the Daily Value100%

050%100%150%200%

The Daily Value for vitamin E is 15 mg of alpha-tocopherol. The 167% printed is 25 divided by 15. NIH's Office of Dietary Supplements states that 1 mg of alpha-tocopherol equals 2 mg of the synthetic all rac form, so 25 mg of this form supplies about 12.5 mg, which is about 83%. The third bar applies a further correction if the 25 mg is the weight of the acetate ester rather than tocopherol equivalents. This desk publishes 83% as the headline because it rests on the conversion ODS states in so many words.

The third bar is a smaller and more cautious correction, and this desk does not lead with it. If the 25 mg is the weight of the acetate ester rather than tocopherol equivalents, the ester being heavier than the free alcohol (472.74 against 430.71 g/mol) would put the figure nearer 11.4 mg, about 76%. The headline on this site is 83%, because that figure rests on a conversion ODS states in so many words.

This is an accuracy finding, not a safety finding

The Tolerable Upper Intake Level for vitamin E in adults is 1,000 mg a day. 25 mg is a long way below it, and nobody is at risk from this row. What is wrong is the number beside it: a reader comparing two supplements on their percent Daily Value columns would conclude this one supplies twice what it does, and the error runs in the direction that flatters the product. The row is set out in full on the ingredients page.

National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Vitamin E: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.
National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Vitamin B6: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.
National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Boron: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.

The derivation, step by step

Seven steps, in the order this desk took them, so the reasoning can be checked rather than taken on trust. Nothing in it is a ceiling and nothing is an estimate: every figure is a printed amount, or a printed amount multiplied by a printed standardisation, or a published figure whose source is named in the same step.

01Start from what is printedNine rows, nine amounts, a serving size of two capsules and thirty servings a container. No proprietary blend and nothing hidden behind a total. This is the whole input, and it is more than most labels in this series provide.
02Check the panel adds up25 + 13.8 + 300 + 200 + 100 + 100 + 50 + 10 + 10 = 808.8 mg a serving, which is 404.4 mg a capsule. A size 0 capsule holds roughly 400 to 500 mg of powder, so the fill is plausible and close to capacity, with the brown rice flour making up the rest. The panel is internally consistent.
03Convert the nutrient formsTwo rows carry a %DV. B6 at 13.8 mg against a 1.7 mg Daily Value is 812%, and the printed figure is correct. Vitamin E is the synthetic all rac form, which NIH converts at 2 mg synthetic to 1 mg alpha-tocopherol, so 25 mg supplies about 12.5 mg: roughly 83% of the Daily Value, not the 167% printed.
04Apply the standardisationsTwo rows print one. Pygeum at 200 mg standardised to 3% phytosterols delivers 6.0 mg of phytosterols. Lycopene 5% at 10 mg delivers 0.5 mg of lycopene. These are multiplications of two printed numbers and nothing else.
05Read the plant partsNettle is declared as leaf. The prostate literature is on nettle root. That is not an arithmetic step, but it changes what the 50 mg can be compared with, which is the same kind of correction.
06Set the results against the published doses6 mg of pygeum sterols against 13 mg in the trial standardisation. 0.5 mg of lycopene against 15 mg. 50 mg of leaf against 360 mg of root. 300 mg of unstandardised saw palmetto against a trial that found nothing at 320, 640 and 960 mg.
07State the limit of the readingNone of this says the product does not work, and none of it is a safety finding. It says that four of the nine rows deliver substantially less of the measured constituent than the published work used, and that a reader could only discover that by doing arithmetic the merchant did not do for them.

Step four is the one to carry away from this page. Two printed numbers multiplied together give the pygeum and lycopene figures, and both multiplications are available to any reader because the label printed both percentages. Step five is not arithmetic at all but belongs with it: the nettle row is the right disclosure of the wrong plant part. All nine rows are set out one at a time here.

Eighteen findings, numbered

Every finding this desk recorded while reading the material supplied with this product, in the order of how much each should change a decision rather than how bad it looks. Finding 1 is the one that decides everything else, because it settles which document governs. Open any finding to read the reasoning and the source. Other pages on this site link to these by number.

01The seller pack says there is no panel. The label artwork carries a full one

This is where the reading starts, because it decides which document governs. The seller pack records that the sales page's What’s inside heading did not print a panel on the fetch, and lists Pygeum, saw palmetto, pumpkin seed, stinging nettle, boron and lycopene as names appearing in a reference list rather than as a declared formula. The label artwork supplied in the same pack carries a complete, fully quantified Supplement Facts panel with nine rows, every one of them bearing an amount. The label wins. It is transcribed on this site exactly as printed, and it is the best label in this series: nine ingredients, nine amounts, no proprietary blend, nothing hidden behind a total. What it means for a reader is narrower and more awkward: the merchant’s own sales page omits the panel its own label carries, so the document that would let a buyer check the product is the one place they are least likely to look.

02The vitamin E percentage is roughly double what the form delivers

The panel declares Vitamin E (as dl-alpha tocopheryl acetate) 25 mg, 167% DV. The arithmetic behind 167% is 25 divided by the 15 mg Daily Value, which is 166.7%. That treats the synthetic form as if it were worth the same per milligram as the natural one, and it is not. The prefix dl- marks it as all rac-alpha-tocopherol, a mixture of all eight stereoisomers of which the body retains four. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements states the conversion directly: 1 mg of alpha-tocopherol equals 1 mg of natural RRR-alpha-tocopherol or 2 mg of synthetic all rac, so 30 mg of the synthetic form would be needed for 100% DV. On that conversion 25 mg of this form supplies about 12.5 mg of alpha-tocopherol, which is about 83% of the Daily Value — close to half of the 167% printed. A second, smaller reduction follows if the 25 mg is the weight of the acetate ester rather than tocopherol equivalents: the ester is heavier than the free alcohol (472.74 against 430.71 g/mol), which would put the figure nearer 11.4 mg, about 76%. This desk publishes 83% as the headline because it rests on the conversion ODS states in so many words. Either way the printed figure overstates what the serving delivers, and nothing about this is unsafe: 25 mg is a long way below the 1,000 mg upper limit. It is an accuracy finding, not a safety one.

03Lycopene 5% of 10 mg is 0.5 mg, and that is the whole row

The panel prints Lycopene 5% (Lycopersicum esculentum) (tomato) 10 mg. Read the row carefully: the 5% is the standardisation of the extract, so the 10 mg is 10 mg of a preparation that is 5% lycopene. The lycopene itself is 10 × 0.05 = 0.5 mg. Set that against the published work. The commonly cited BPH trial (Schwarz and colleagues, Journal of Nutrition, 2008) gave 15 mg of lycopene a day for six months to 40 men. This serving is one thirtieth of that. Set it against food instead and the gap widens: USDA’s own figures put one cup of canned tomato juice at 21.96 mg of lycopene and one cup of canned tomato puree at 54.39 mg. A cup of tomato juice carries about 44 times the lycopene in a day of this product; a cup of puree, about 109 times. The row is not wrong and it is not hidden — the label discloses the percentage, which many do not. It simply does not amount to much.

04Two hundred milligrams of pygeum that delivers less sterol than a hundred

This is the most instructive row on the label, because the bigger number loses. The panel prints Pygeum africanum Extract (bark) 200 mg, std. to 3% phytosterols. The phytosterols are the measured constituent, so the serving delivers 200 × 0.03 = 6.0 mg of them. The clinical literature on pygeum uses extract standardised to 13% total sterols, at around 100 mg a day or 50 mg twice daily. One hundred milligrams at 13% delivers 13 mg of sterols. So this product prints twice the milligram figure of the trial dose and delivers roughly 46% of the sterols — about 2.2 times less. That is the whole argument for reading a standardisation percentage before a milligram figure, in one row, on one label. Credit where it is due: this label prints the percentage, which is what makes the calculation possible. A label that printed only “Pygeum 200 mg” would look better and tell you less.

05The nettle is the leaf, and the prostate literature is on the root

The panel prints Nettle Extract (leaf) 50 mg. The part is stated, which is good practice. It is also the wrong part for the indication. The clinical work on nettle and benign prostatic hyperplasia is on Urtica dioica root: trials have used aqueous root extract at 360 mg a day for six months, and methanol root extract at 600 to 1,200 mg a day. Nettle leaf has its own literature — topical use for rheumatic complaints, and trials in osteoarthritis pain and allergic rhinitis — and none of it concerns the prostate. Two gaps therefore sit on top of each other in this row: the wrong plant part, and 50 mg against a root dose of 360 mg, which is about seven times more even if the part had matched.

06Saw palmetto at 300 mg, below the lowest arm of the trial that found nothing

Saw palmetto is the largest row on the panel at 300 mg, and it is the ingredient with the most serious trial behind it. The CAMUS trial (Barry and colleagues, JAMA, 2011) randomised 369 men, started them on 320 mg a day, doubled the dose at 24 weeks and tripled it at 48, and ran for 72 weeks. The result: mean AUA Symptom Index fell 2.20 points on saw palmetto and 2.99 on placebo, P = .91, with no difference from placebo at any dose and no benefit on any secondary outcome. Two things follow and both matter. The first is that 300 mg is below even the starting arm of a trial that escalated to 960 mg and still found nothing. The second is more basic: this row prints no standardisation at all. The trial extracts are lipidosterolic preparations standardised to a stated fatty-acid content; “Saw Palmetto Extract (fruit) 300 mg” could be any of several materials. The label standardises the pygeum and the lycopene and not this.

07Vitamin B6 at 13.8 mg clears the American limit and exceeds the European one

The panel prints Vitamin B6 13.8 mg, 812% DV, and the percentage is correct: 13.8 divided by the 1.7 mg Daily Value is 811.8%. Credit the arithmetic. The figure to put beside it is the upper limit, and there are two of them. The US Food and Nutrition Board sets a Tolerable Upper Intake Level of 100 mg a day, so this serving is about 14% of it — comfortably clear. The European Food Safety Authority, reviewing the same question in 2023, set an adult limit of 12 mg a day, based on reviews of sensory peripheral neuropathy. On that figure this serving is about 15% above the limit. The neuropathy literature itself concerns much higher chronic intakes — reported cases start around 500 mg a day, and studies at an average of 200 mg a day for up to five years found no evidence of it — so this is not a warning. It is the kind of fact a reader taking several supplements at once should be able to see, and the label gives them no way to see it.

08Ten milligrams of boron is half the upper limit in one serving

Boron (as boron amino acid chelate) 10 mg. Boron has no Daily Value — the Food and Nutrition Board found the data insufficient to set one, so the ** on this row is correct. It does have a Tolerable Upper Intake Level, and for adults it is 20 mg a day. One serving of this product is half of it. For scale: median boron intake from food in the United States runs about 0.87 to 1.35 mg a day, and total intake from food and supplements together about 1.0 to 1.5 mg. This serving is therefore roughly seven to ten times a typical total daily intake. NIH records no adverse effects from supplemental doses within the upper limit and no known clinically relevant drug interactions, so nothing here is an alarm. It is a number worth knowing before adding a second product that also contains boron.

09Grape seed extract is on a prostate panel with no prostate rationale given

Grape Seed Extract (Vitis vinifera) (seed) 100 mg is the third-largest botanical row. Grape seed extract is studied as an antioxidant and in cardiovascular contexts; it is not one of the ingredients the prostate literature is built on, and the merchant’s material offers no account of why it is in a Precision Prostate Support Blend. This is not a safety point and it is not an accusation of padding. It is a gap in the explanation: a reader who wants to know what each row is doing can find an answer for seven of the nine and not for this one.

10The guarantee is printed as 60 days in one place and 90 in another

The seller pack records that the sales page prints both a 60-day promise and a 90-day refund contact line, and the money-back badge supplied in the asset pack reads 60 DAY. Those cannot both be the term. A refund window is the one commercial promise a buyer may actually need to rely on, and the difference between the two figures is a month. This site prints both, labelled as both, and does not choose between them, because choosing would mean inventing a term. Confirm the window at the live checkout and in the refund policy before ordering, and keep a copy of the page you were shown.

11The $119 is struck through with no evidence it was ever the price

The sales page prints one bottle at $69 with $119 struck through beside it. A struck-through figure is a reference price, and it carries an implied claim: that this was the price, or is the price elsewhere. Nothing in the material supplied evidences that $119 was ever charged. The six-bottle copy names $49 against $69 and free shipping against $19.99, which is a clearer kind of comparison because both halves are the seller’s own current prices. The three-bottle pack is shown with no total printed at all, so the pricing table on this site leaves that row empty rather than interpolating between $69 and $49.

12The label artwork still carries the printer's instructions

Along the foot of the supplied label wrap, beside the regulatory marks, is a grey rectangle reading AREA FOR BARCODE with the note “Background must be white and barcode must be black”. That is a production instruction to whoever sets the artwork, and it is not something that appears on a printed retail label. What this desk has been shown, therefore, is a pre-press proof rather than a photograph of a bottle in a buyer’s hand. It is still the best label document in this series and it is transcribed here in full. But the distinction is worth holding: a reader cannot confirm from this that the artwork, with its nine quantified rows, is what is actually wrapped round the bottle they receive. Checking the panel on arrival against the panel on this page takes about a minute.

13The bottle text in the hero graphic does not match the product's own label

The wide marketing image supplied with the pack shows a man at a kitchen counter behind five bottles. The text on those bottles does not read PRECISION PROSTATE SUPPORT BLEND. It reads PRESIOUN PEDSTATE SUPPORT BLEAD on the front bottle and a similar string on the ones behind it. This desk is describing what the image shows and is making no claim about how the image was produced. What it costs the reader is small but real: the lead marketing picture for this product shows a bottle that is not this bottle.

14Three contact identities, two states, and a distributor that matches none of them

A buyer with a problem has to work out who they are dealing with. The label says Nutrova, Tallmadge, Ohio, with the email [email protected]. The shop is prostacylsupport.com with [email protected], an office at 215 Park Avenue South in New York and a returns address at 1370 Avenue of the Americas, a different New York building. The refund line is [email protected], a generic support domain belonging to none of them, and the order desk number is a shared one. Shared order-handling infrastructure is ordinary in this trade and none of this is evidence of wrongdoing. The cost is specific: there is no single name that appears on the bottle, the shop and the refund line, so there is nothing a buyer can look up once and be done.

15Eight of the ten reviewer photographs are reused from other brands

Each of the ten reviews on the merchant’s page carries a portrait. This desk holds the asset packs for several unrelated products that use the same review layout and ran an MD5 checksum over every portrait in every pack. Eight of the ten Prostacyl portraits are byte-for-byte identical to portraits presented under different names, ages and cities on other brands’ sites. Byte-for-byte means the same file, not a similar photograph. Two of the ten do not match anything this desk holds, which is reported here as carefully as the eight that do. The digests are printed in full on the reviews page so the check can be repeated with one command.

16The ten reviews share a fixed sentence rotation with other brands

Beyond the photographs, the text has a structure. Each review is an occupation line, an objection conceded within a sentence, and a closing pair: a place the bottle is kept, then a moment in the day it is taken. The ten places run washer, router, piano, next to the leash, glove box, fridge door, beside the stamp dish, charging pad, lunch tote, workbench — in that order, in positions one to ten. The identical ten places appear in the identical ten positions in review sets supplied for unrelated products. The reviews page sets the sets side by side.

17Badges the label has earned, and badges it has not

Ten compact badges came with the asset pack. Three of them restate things the label itself supports: gluten free and dairy free are consistent with an Other Ingredients line reading gelatin and brown rice flour, and made in USA matches the label’s own properly qualified mark. One contradicts the label outright: the Vegetarian badge sits over a product whose capsule is gelatin, which is an animal product. One asserts something no document supports: Doctor Formulated, with no doctor named anywhere in the material. And FDA Registered means a facility has filed a registration, which is a legal requirement rather than an endorsement — FDA does not approve dietary supplements, and the agency’s registration of a facility says nothing about any product made in it.

18‘Supports healthy prostate size’, on a page reached through a flow warning

Of the three claims on the label front, two are ordinary structure/function statements: Promotes Healthy Urinary Flow and Supports Energy & Male Vitality. The third, Supports Healthy Prostate Size, sits closer to the line. A dietary supplement may claim to support the normal structure or function of the body; it may not claim to treat, prevent or mitigate a disease, and an enlarged prostate is a disease state with a name. Context matters to how a claim reads, and the sales page for this product is reached at a URL ending /flow-warning/. The label itself carries the required FDA disclaimer in full and in capitals, which is correct and is to the merchant’s credit. This finding is about one phrase read in the setting it is sold in, and it is the kind of judgement FDA makes case by case rather than one a reader can settle from a label alone.

Questions people actually ask

Nine questions about the label and the regulation, phrased the way people type them. Type to filter.

prostacyl supplement facts panel

There is one, and it is complete: 9 rows, 9 printed amounts, a serving size of 2 capsules, 30 servings a container, no proprietary blend, five binomials, six plant parts and two standardisations. It is transcribed on this page exactly as printed. The complication is documentary rather than nutritional: the seller pack records that the sales page’s What’s inside heading printed no panel, so the merchant’s own shopfront omits the best document the product has.

is a supplement facts panel required by law

A dietary supplement sold in the United States must bear one. The rule is 21 CFR 101.36, and FDA’s own labeling guide puts the central requirement plainly: you must list the names and quantities of dietary ingredients present in your product. Names and quantities. This label does both, for all nine rows, which is why this page is a transcription rather than an argument.

what does the double asterisk mean on a supplement facts panel

It marks a row for which no Daily Value has been established, and the footnote beneath the panel says so. Seven of the nine rows here carry it, correctly: the botanicals and the boron have no Daily Value, because the Food and Nutrition Board has not set one. A ** is not a warning and not an admission. It is the right mark in the right place.

dl alpha tocopheryl acetate vs natural vitamin e

The dl- prefix marks the synthetic all rac form, a mixture of eight stereoisomers of which the body retains four. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements states that 1 mg of alpha-tocopherol equals 1 mg of natural RRR-alpha-tocopherol or 2 mg of the synthetic form. The 25 mg printed here therefore supplies about 12.5 mg, roughly 83% of the 15 mg Daily Value rather than the 167% printed.

vitamin b6 812 percent daily value too much

The percentage is correct: 13.8 divided by 1.7 is 811.8%, and the panel prints 812%. The US upper limit is 100 mg a day, so this serving is about 14% of it. EFSA set an adult limit of 12 mg in 2023, and on that figure the serving is about 15% above. Reported neuropathy cases start far higher, around 500 mg a day. The figure is worth knowing if you take anything else containing B6.

is prostacyl fda approved

No dietary supplement is. FDA does not approve dietary supplements before they are marketed, and this product makes no approval claim. The label carries MANUFACTURED IN A FDA REGISTERED FACILITY, which means a facility has filed a registration — a legal requirement rather than an endorsement, and it says nothing about any product made there. cGMP compliance under 21 CFR Part 111 is likewise a requirement, not a distinction.

who makes prostacyl nutrova

The label prints Distributed By: Nutrova, Tallmadge, OH 44278, USA with the email [email protected]. A named distributor with a place of business, printed on the label itself, is a real credit and most products in this series do not manage it. It matches neither address the retailer publishes: the office is at 215 Park Avenue South, Floor 13, New York, NY 10003, USA and returns go to 1370 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 4, New York, NY 10019, USA.

prostacyl certificate of analysis

A certificate number was supplied, P-4126-26-PR, together with a lot code, P-26/PR-4126. No certificate was supplied, no laboratory is named and no analytes are listed. On a product with a panel this complete, a certificate is exactly the document that would close the loop: it reports quantities ingredient by ingredient, which is how a reader would confirm that the nine printed amounts are the nine amounts in the capsule.

prostacyl label made in usa

The label’s own mark reads MADE IN THE USA, USING FOREIGN AND U.S. INGREDIENTS, which is a properly qualified country-of-origin claim and the correct way to make one. A compact badge in the marketing set reads simply Made in USA, unqualified. Where the two disagree, the label is the better document and this site prints the label.

References

Every source below was opened and read. The first is the one this page leans on hardest and is worth opening yourself: it is FDA’s own guide to the panel this product actually has.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter IV, Nutrition Labeling (21 CFR 101.36).
National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Vitamin E: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.
National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Vitamin B6: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.
National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Boron: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.

Read the panel before you decide

Sixty capsules, two a day, thirty days a bottle. The Supplement Facts panel declares nine ingredients and nine amounts, with no proprietary blend — the most transparent label in this series. Four of those nine rows change meaning once the arithmetic is done, and all four sums are shown in full. One bottle is $69; six are $49 each. The refund window is printed as 60 days in one place and 90 in another.

1 bottle60 capsules30 days$69 · $2.30 a day 3 bottles180 capsules90 daysNo total published 6 bottles360 capsules180 days$49 each · free shipping

Order Prostacyl now Compare the packs

60 or 90 days — the page prints both
Nine ingredients, nine printed amounts, no blend
Returns to 1370 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 4, New York, NY 10019, USA

Prices as printed on the sales page, as of October 12, 2026: one bottle $69, six bottles $49 each with free shipping. The three-bottle total is not published, so it is left blank rather than estimated. The refund window is printed as 60 days in one place and 90 in another — confirm it at the checkout. Questions first? Every published contact route is here.

Keep reading

All nine ingredients in detailWhat is printed, what it delivers, and what the published work used, row by row.What each of the nine rows is doingWhich rows have a prostate literature behind them, and what precision can mean here.The badges, and what each would have to sayTen supplied marks, one contradicted by the label and one naming no doctor.How to take itThe directions are printed on the label, which is the right way round.

Authorship and review

Who wrote and checked this page

Written byThe Prostacyl Editorial DeskLabel analysis and fact-checking

Medically reviewed byDr. Akhil Saji, MD, PhysicianA named clinician or dietitian, once one has read these pages.

RoleMedical reviewerChecks the label transcription, the arithmetic and every safety statement on this page.

Review dateOctober 12, 2026The date a named reviewer signed off this page.

Who reviews these pages?

What this page was checked against

The label artwork, read at 2× and transcribed character for character. Where the label and the marketing disagree, the label is printed.
The seller pack, quoted rather than paraphrased, and identified as marketing wherever it is used.
The published sources listed in the references on this page. Every one was opened and read; none is cited from memory.
The arithmetic, shown in full. Every amount on this panel is printed, so the figures here are conversions of printed amounts with the working given, never ceilings and never estimates.
Nothing else. Any fact that was not supplied is recorded as not published rather than filled in.

Last updated October 12, 2026. A highlighted slot is a value no human has supplied yet. Who reviews these pages?